2017/05/16 (Tue) 在韓邦人は、自己責任で


これは、先週、打ち上げた大陸間弾道弾ではないが、明確に韓国と日本に照準を合わしている。弾道弾はアメリカ大陸だが、2~3年で完成するという。

外務省の「海外在留邦人統計数」によると平成28年10月現在の統計数で韓国にいる在留邦人は、38,060名(2015年10月)である。ソウル市には 8,618人 となっている。また韓国への日本人旅行者については、約260,000人となっている。日韓間の人の往来は,約739万人(2016年)である。


アメリカは頼りにならない

一機に北朝鮮を壊滅させるには、核攻撃の他、手はない。「核攻撃を推薦するぐらいなら辞任する」と米国安全保障局のアドバイザーがブルームバーグ紙の質問に書いている。それでは、トランプは決意するのか?この人間ほど信用が出来ない大統領は古今東西いない。日本も、韓国も、アメリカの核の傘の中に入っているが、核を使ってもアメリカが日韓を守るという保証などない。事実上、そのような約束は意味がない。実際、アメリカは韓国にいる30,000人の将兵を引き揚げたい。


砲声が一発鳴ると

仁川の空港は閉鎖される。在韓邦人も旅行者も韓国を離れることが出来なくなる。安倍晋三は「朝鮮戦争は起きない」に賭けているように見える。もしも、裏目に出たら日本人は韓国から出られなくなる。伊勢は、「在韓邦人は、日本に帰国するべきだ」と思っている。自分の命を守るのは自分である。伊勢


対米広報に、ご寄付を頂きたい


30th aniversary

伊勢は、ブルームバーグにコメントを書いている。今朝は、ブルームバーグ紙に以下のように投稿した。伊勢は日韓国交断絶を望む。さらに、米韓国交断絶も望む。今朝は、そのように書いて投稿した。多くのアメリカの知識人は賛成しており、「米軍も韓国から撤退するべきだ」と書いている。こういう声が大きくなれば日韓断交は可能である。

A) 振込口座

1)金融機関   みずほ銀行・上大岡支店・支店番号 364
2)口座番号   (普通)    2917217
3)口座名    隼機関   ハヤブサキカン

B) 郵便局口座

1)口座番号  10940-26934811
2)口座名    隼機関   ハヤブサキカン

*5月14日、MIZ・TA様から、40、000円のご献金を頂きました。馬齢76になる伊勢です。感謝致します。伊勢

Iseheijiro • 5 hours ago
Away from the subject. What Trump will do about North Korea. North Korea is not imminent threat to US. It is imminent threat to South Korea and Japan. The two countries are under the US nuclear umbrella. If US is not using nuclear warheads to stop Pyongyang from using it, then South Korea and Japan should be allowed to arm nuclear weapons.
1 • Edit• Reply•Share ›

Avatar
disqus_yw4zcL89o5 Iseheijiro • 3 hours ago
Other than grandstanding to appease Xi, Trump has reduced sea patrols in the disputed waters, is turning a blind eye to the billions that China still sends to NK, all to distract from the Russian connection which seems to be getting more serious all the time. He is selling the farm bit by bit, and when the cows come home and have no where to feed, the Russian connection will get full exposure.
• Reply•Share ›

Avatar
Iseheijiro disqus_yw4zcL89o5 • 44 minutes ago
Your short sentence is far better than any Bloomberg article. Being simple and clear is the proof of intelligence. North Korea knows Trump's weakness and China also takes full advantages of that. When Japanese government warns Japanese in Korea to leave it's the beginning of the end of US/Japan security treaty. Southeast Asia has a doubtful eyes on US now!

2017/05/13 (Sat) それでも、善い本は読まれている
book storee Japan

出版業界の斜陽化が叫ばれて久しい。本の競合相手とは、テレビ~アニメ~雑誌~電子本である。従来の本に対して、ライノベというジャンルもある。「若者の読書離れ」というのは事実だが、本が読まれなくなったわけではない。「善い本」が少ないとは言えるだろう。ベストセラーを検索すると、「どうして、これがベストセラーなんだろう?」と思う作品が上位を占めている。ベストセラーとなった原因を考えてみた。その答えは、メデイアのようだ。ベストセラーは、メディアが作りあげたものである。つまり、とくに美人でもないマリリン・モンローをスターにしたハリウッドと同じ商法である。日本のメデイアというのは、テレビである。作家がお笑い芸人だったというだけで、芥川賞を受賞したりする。アマゾンのカスタマレビュウを読むとき、伊勢は、星一つとか、星二つの辛辣な批評を読む。星五つを与えるミーハーではないからである。本を選ぶとき、絶賛評を読んで買ってはいけない。気が着いたことがある。日本人は海外のジャンルに関心がないということである。冒険小説も少ない。日本が住み心地の良い国だからであろう。現在、日本に世界に通じる国際派の作家は存在しない。イギリスが日本の正反対である。イギリス人が、いかに海外に関心があるかという証左である。

日本の小説業界

博報堂が出している推定市場規模をもとに小説市場を割り出してみると、漫画・小説の推定市場規模は、7800億円とある(2011年の調査)。ここから、漫画市場の3900億円(2011年)を引いた額が推定の小説市場規模となる。小説の市場規模は、3900億円(2011年)である。小説市場は漫画市場と同等ということになる。出版業界が斜陽というのは正確な表現ではない。3900億円は、大きいからだ。ただ、「善い本」が少ないとは言えるだろう。原因は、人生を知らない若者が書いて、人生を知らない若者が読むからだろう。つまり、作家も、読者も、知的レベルが低下しているとなる。伊勢

2017/05/12 (Fri) 米朝戦争の可能性が高い
abe I wont

安倍首相は「韓国は、戦略的利益を共有する、最も重要な隣国であり、北朝鮮問題で連携して対処するとともに、未来志向の日韓関係を発展させていきたいと思います」と述べた。(FNN)

アメリカは韓国を見捨てる

理由を述べるまでもないだろう。韓国が保護国のアメリカを裏切ったからだ。その韓国に抱き着いているのは、暗愚なる日本の首相安倍晋三だ。この国家指導者は、なにゆえか戦争になったときの準備をしていない。「戦争などない」と信じているように見える。アメリカが開戦すれば当然、北朝鮮は滅びる。ソウルも火の海となり、何十万人の韓国人が灰になるのだろう。しかし、それが戦争というものだ。安倍が言う「北朝鮮問題で連携して対処する」とはどういう対処なのだろうか?戦争のツケを払うとか、難民の面倒を見るとか?何度も、伊勢は「安倍晋三は詐欺師である」と書いてきた。日本の国民は、自分、自分の家族を自分が守らなければならない。そこで、ようやく、安倍晋三に騙されたと気が着くのだろう。日本人は運命論者なのかも知れない。伊勢


対米広報に、ご寄付を頂きたい


30th aniversary

伊勢は、ブルームバーグにコメントを書いている。昨夜、韓国大統領選の報道を読んで、ブルームバーグ紙に以下のように投稿した。伊勢は日韓国交断絶を望む。さらに、米韓国交断絶も望む。今朝は、そのように書いて投稿した。多くのアメリカの知識人は賛成しており、「米軍も韓国から撤退するべきだ」と書いている。こういう声が大きくなれば日韓断交は可能である。

A) 振込口座

1)金融機関   みずほ銀行・上大岡支店・支店番号 364
2)口座番号   (普通)    2917217
3)口座名    隼機関   ハヤブサキカン

B) 郵便局口座

1)口座番号  10940-26934811
2)口座名    隼機関   ハヤブサキカン

*2月28日、MIZ・TA様から、20、000円のご献金を頂きました。馬齢76になる伊勢です。感謝致します。伊勢

Keith_Fenton • 2 days ago
Washington should immediately place the North Korean government on the U.S. list of 'state sponsors of terror' for its public assassination of Kim's half-brother in Malaysia. At the same time, it should make it illegal for Americans to travel to that country under penalty of jail and a stiff fine. If you aid the regime with your tourist dollars, you should be punished. If you travel there anyway, and are prevented from leaving, it must be made clear the United States will not lift a finger to get you back. All aid to the North, including food aid, must cease. To give in any way allows the regime to direct its own capital to weapons and missile development. The State Department must begin a detailed study, to be publicized upon completion, of all the countries in the world that do business with the North, and those which have diplomatic relations, and we must make known exactly what that business, and what those relations constitute. That is the only 'sunshine policy' that with begin to change the dynamic and the dialogue to this seemingly intractable problem. Kim's use of North Korean citizens for contract labor in countries like Malaysia is nothing short of slavery. Governments that allow such exploitation must be exposed.
2 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Keith_Fenton • 2 days ago
Moon wants to revive a 'sunshine policy' towards North Korea, engaging the hermit regime, and reviving joint economic ventures. He doesn't want to isolate Pyongyang, but to 'engage' Kim and his insane government. The United States must make it abundantly clear to Seoul that, while the U.S. and the Republic of Korea are allies and friends, we are not going to be wagged by accommodative policies that have failed repeatedly in the past, and which have no chance of succeeding in future, and which will only succeed in providing time and resources to Kim in his quest to have the means to strike the continental United States. If Seoul buckles and goes passive, that government must be made to understand that under that circumstance, Washington will not abide, and will leave the South out of the loop. Either Pyongyang ends its nuclear quest, or face destruction by the United States.
2 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Keith_Fenton • 2 days ago
Keith, thank you. As I am Japanese American I have seen the result of the election as a betrayal to US and Japan. It may sound radical, however, I would like US government to cut off their alliance with South Korea and pull US troops out of Korea. Japan and US can defend themselves from North Korea without South Korea's military, which is nothing.
1 • Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Asahi Iseheijiro • 2 days ago
You are a Japanese American?

Most Americans understand that Korea is a key ally in Asia-Pacific who fought with them in Vietnam. Furthermore, vert few Americans would be so undemocratic as to advocate that Washington cut off its alliances with countries that exercised their democratic choice.

My money is on you being a right-wing Japanese nationalist, with nary a whiff of US citizenship.
4 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Asahi • 2 days ago
We can be an ally without having troops on the ground.
3 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Joe Brady • a day ago
We can attack or destroy North Korea anytime from anyplace. Ground troops is actually a hostage to the both Korea. Withdraw our ground troops is good for US and Japan. We save a lot of money that reduces US debt.
1 • Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Eason Park Iseheijiro • a day ago
Japanese are sometimes disappointing by their poor understanding the relationship between Korea and the US. Korea is not only beneficiary of the alliance but also lynch-pin for the US hegemony in the Asia Pacific. Korea, at some points, is more important than Japan for the US.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Eason Park • 20 hours ago
Ignorant man! Ask Tillerson. Moron!
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Asahi • 2 days ago
How much do you know Moon Jae-in? You don't seem to know what his political stance is. GWB wanted to pull our troops out of Korea. Pulling out troops means cutting off alliance. I have a question for you. Why can't I be an American while I love my country Japan?
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Iseheijiro • 2 days ago
We should pull out of Japan as well. They don't need our help.
3 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Joe Brady • 2 days ago
True. We can still be allies. I want US reduces her debt. Japan should change their constitution and arm nukes. Japan's navy is the second large navy to USN. Our submarines(26) are half a size of US subs but we are formidable. https://youtu.be/xYko2W3fjSY
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Holdfast_II Iseheijiro • a day ago
Do you think that China will tolerate Japan or South Korea going nuclear? China WANTS the US in Japan and South Korea because it keeps those nations from arming up like they would have to if the US security blanket wasn't there.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Holdfast_II • 20 hours ago
You must be a Chinese troll. lol. Why should we listen to China? Colin Powell and Richard Armitage suggested Japan to consider nuclear arm. My American nephew who was an intelligent officer at cold war time said to me that Japan perhaps had nuclear warheads provided by US.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Holdfast_II • 20 hours ago
China can't do anything about Japan and SK arming up or nuclearizing.

It could, however, pre-empt it by getting rid of Kim, and coming to an agreement on the China Sea claims. They have rational leadership. I doubt they spend money building and protecting islands to no practical end.

With the price of oil low, and the area relatively unexplored, now would be a good time to put all the issues on the table.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Joe Brady • 7 minutes ago
Can't agree more.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Iseheijiro • 2 days ago
Yup. The problems are 1945 are the problems of 1945. China is a bit like the US. We're both bigger than we are effective. Barring the use of nuclear weapons, China is not a threat to Japan. China isn't even a threat to Vietnam, or the other ASEAN nations.

Our alliance can be that Japan takes care of itself, but that the US will expedite as much military hardware, satellite support, etc., that Japan needs. China won't want to bother with that.

NK seems to be in intractable issue, since the UN allowed them to build a nuclear arsenal, but SK and Japan will have to deal with the UN's error.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Joe Brady • 2 days ago
Agreed. I don't see China is a threat to Japan. I have to say Japanese are spoiled by American government who needs Japan for their fortress. I dislike Abe. He is a sneaky fellow. US actually reduced military in Japan following agreement. It's a very good agreement. US wants to relocate Okinawa marine base (Helis and Osprey) to east side of Okinawa maine land and Japan has begun building foundation on the sea.I hope Kim understands we are ready to attack nuclear site and other short range missile sites. He may not stop developing bombs and warheads.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Haler44 Iseheijiro • 2 days ago
This sounds like the imperialistic Japanese mentality that led to World War II when the Japanese government treated Korea and all of Asia as Japan's subservient hinterland. This in turn led to the division of Korea into two parts after World War II. After years of Japanese occupation, both parts were about equally poor and subject to authoritarian governments after the war.

With the strong military and economic support of the U.S. since North Korea invaded South Korea in 1950, the people of South Korea have built their country into a prosperous, democratic member of the community of nations that engage in trade and cultural exchanges, and resolve their differences without threats of violence. In contrast, North Korea has remained a belligerent outcast propped up by arguably the most brutal totalitarian government on earth.

Recognizing these stark differences between South and North Korea, I would no sooner abandon our alliance with South Korea than I would with, say, Japan, Taiwan, or Australia. All civilized people need to stick together to oppose the likes of North Korea.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Haler44 • 2 days ago
Whilst I disagree with your historical view I advocate US to attack North Korea. My reason is that Kim doesn't listen and Moon is an appeaser. South Korea has been unreliable US ally for decades. Japan and US have to determine to destroy North Korea once and for all. As a byproduct Seoul may be gone but it's OK with me.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Haler44 Iseheijiro • a day ago
I served in South Korea as a U.S. Army officer about 50 years ago, and everything that I experienced then and since has made it very clear that South Korea is as firm an ally of the U.S. in opposing Communist aggression as any other nation.

And with good reason, because nowhere in the world is there a greater contrast between the way that people with identical ethnic and cultural backgrounds can experience radically different qualities of life under a totalitarian Communist government versus a democratic government with a capitalist economy (despite its being too concentrated in large corporations).

Do you know which is better? Or care?

Your disregard for the fate of the 10 million plus people in the Seoul area gives you about zero credibility with any civilized person. (Nevertheless, as an advocate of credible military deterrence, I concur that the likelihood of North Korea shelling Seoul with artillery in the event of a U.S. strike on its nuclear facilities should not totally obviate that option of such a strike. I would hope that the South Korean government has made plans to protect Seoul's citizens in such an eventuality).
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Haler44 • a day ago
So you let Kim Jong Un gets nuclear bombs and warheads? After all it's a Korean civil war and it's not the US problem either Japan's problem. South Korea has 50 million population and economic advantage over 25 million North Korea which has next to nothing to eat. Moon even said today South Korean military can destroy North Korea easily. Our ground troops should get out Korea. We keep alliance.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Keith_Fenton Iseheijiro • 2 days ago
It amazes me the Koreans would elect a guy associated with the failed policies of the past. I favor waiting to see how Moon's election victory plays out, and I think we're stronger with that forward base; I just don't want Seoul to go wobbly on the alliance.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Haler44 Keith_Fenton • a day ago
Part of the reason why South Korea elected this particular candidate is that they have a system similar to that in the U.S. whereby somebody can win with less than a majority of popular votes, as both he and Trump did. I would argue that there are a couple of improvements that could be made to this voting process, but it is still a dam site better than the "process" in North Korea.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Keith_Fenton • 2 days ago
I doubt they go wobbly. We pull out, and they replace us with additional SK troops.
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Keith_Fenton • 2 days ago
My bet is he will fail by going against US and Japan. To me, Korea, north and south are failed states without our help. 37,000 American servicemen died at Korean War 65 years ago. US and Japan spent billions dollars to keep Korea as a democratic state and they betrayed us.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Mahony Iseheijiro • 20 hours ago
As a Japanese-American you know the treatment of Korea when it was a colony of Japan. A SK government would face over though if it were found be in alliance with Japan. The same is true of China, they have not forgotten the treatment of Chinese Nationals by Japanese soldiers during WWII. .
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Joe Mahony • 17 hours ago
Sure, but everyone else are on good terms. We rebuilt both Germany and Japan after WWII. The US is quite popular in Vietnam, despite that long war. SK & China don't have to forget the atrocities, but they also don't have to allow those atrocities from making currently logical decisions.
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Joe Mahony • 20 hours ago
Are you an American? You smell Chinese troll. Americans are smart. They don't listen to your fake history. They don't want bring WWII to discuss the today's issue. Moron, moron, moron!
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Sarastro92 Iseheijiro • a day ago
Everyone would be better off with the US out of Korea
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Sarastro92 • 20 hours ago
Yup. Korean Peninsular is an oven. Why should we keep our men and women there? We have bunch of ignorant in White House and Congress. I bet they don't even know what is "Sovietization" means. North Korea is the last Soviet on this planet.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Sarastro92 • 20 hours ago
Doesn't that depend on whether or not Kim invades SK 5 minutes after we leave?
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Sarastro92 Joe Brady • 18 hours ago
The SKoreans have every advantage if there were a war... straw man/red herring aren't persuasive
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Sarastro92 • 17 hours ago
Strawman? Seriously? You don't think there is any chance of Kim invading SK after we leave?
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
BioBehavioralView • 2 days ago
Don’t Just Do Something

“The rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connexion as possible.” -President George Washington (1796)

Our diplomats tell us that every problem is too complex for the rest of us to understand. True — when you have no basic principles.

So, South Korea has a new President soft on North Korea. His supporters aren’t keen on having American missiles there; nevertheless, we’ll borrow a billion dollars from the Chinese to install them, so South Korea remains safe to continue raping us economically.

Hey, the Cold War is over! Is it in the national interest of these United States of America to involve ourselves in a potential nuclear catastrophe to protect our economic adversary? Well, maybe not in our interest but in the interest of our “military-industrial complex”.

“The only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history.” -Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831)

Recall the warning from President Eisenhower? Right, forget about it! Who cares about history anyway, let alone principles? Excuse me, somebody who “friended” me is sending me a meaningless “text”.

See “What Me Worry?” & “Defend South Korea” under ...
http://nationonfire.com/cat... .
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady BioBehavioralView • 2 days ago
I agree. At some point, one must ask 'what are we doing there?'. If SK doesn't want the missile defense program, then let them do without it. And without US troops as well.
2 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Joe Brady • a day ago
Let north and south Korea kill each other or f'ck each other. China or Russia is not interested in Korean peninsular. Many Japanese wants to
cut off Japanese Korean relations and getting louder.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Iseheijiro • 21 hours ago
The problem is not the Koreans, it is Kim. In the Middle East, it's possible the only solution is to let them kill each other to settle their 1300 year's old rivalry. It was unfortunately the same way in Europe in the first half of the 20th century. Once they killed enough of each other, and leveled enough of each other's cities, they finally gave up on war as a solution. ME might be the same.

I'd bet a military coup would work wonders in NK. The Chinese could guarantee their survival, with us giving our usual 'we want the people to be heard' speech, while looking the other way. It might take another 50 years, but the threat of a massive war would be greatly diminished.
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Joe Brady • 20 hours ago
When Soviet Russia and Communist China had influence over North Korea we needed US troops in South Korea to counter balance to them. Today Russia or PRC is not interested in North Korea. North Korea is completely isolated now. However, they have developed primitive nuclear bombs. North Korea's nuclear weapons are everyone's threat. I would like to see US pulls out troops out of Korea to defuse tension. We still are their ally and our naval bases are there. US 7th fleet is stationed at Japan. That is enough to keep our guns at the temple of Kim Jong-UN.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Joe Brady Iseheijiro • 19 hours ago
The advantage of pulling out of SK is that NK then becomes the UN's problem. At that point, if I were the POTUS, I'd tell the UN we were poised to do whatever they voted for.

If the UN voted to allow NK to build a nuclear arsenal, I would ramp up our missile defense, and offer to sell to Japan and SK whatever weapons they wanted. And I would make sure that China and Russia understood that to include nuclear weapons, just in case that concerned them.

Alternately, if the UN voted to disarm NK, I would make our entire fleet available to take out their nuclear facilities, and any other offensive weapons they have, as well as to take our fair share of an international force for the ground fighting.
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Iseheijiro Joe Brady • 19 hours ago
You are far better than any US president I know. If you cannot make tough decision then you are not president of USA. America stands for peace and human right. Sometime Americans have to decide what is the best for all of us who wants eternal peace. Thank you Joe.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›


2017/05/11 (Thu) だから断交が望ましいのである
moon anti japan

日韓合意「受け入れられない」
05/11 22:22

韓国の大統領府は11日、日韓首脳の電話会談の中で、韓国の文在寅(ムン・ジェイン)大統領が安倍首相に対して、「日韓合意について、大多数の韓国国民が受け入れることができないのが現実だ」と伝えたことを明らかにした。韓国大統領府の広報官は、「(国民の大多数が)合意を受け入れられないのが現実で、民間の領域で起きた問題に対して、政府が解決するのは限界があり、時間が必要」と述べた。このうえで、文大統領は、慰安婦問題の解決のためには、「国民の情緒と現実を認めて、両政府が共同で努力するべきだ」と安倍首相に伝えたという。

安倍晋三に残った手

これでは、親韓も反韓もヘッタクレもないではないか?大使召喚だけでなく、東京の韓国大使にお引き取り願うのが晋三に残った手である。


対米広報に、ご寄付を頂きたい


30th aniversary

伊勢は、ブルームバーグにコメントを書いている。昨夜、韓国大統領選の報道を読んで、ブルームバーグ紙に以下のように投稿した。伊勢は日韓国交断絶を望む。さらに、米韓国交断絶も望む。今朝は、そのように書いて投稿した。多くのアメリカの知識人は賛成しており、「米軍も韓国から撤退するべきだ」と書いている。こういう声が大きくなれば日韓断交は可能である。

Moon Jae-in is pro-China, pro-North Korea, anti-USA and anti-Japan. Washington must consider to pull US military out of Korea. US and Japan can defend themselves from North Korea without Korea. We can save a lot of money by doing that.

A) 振込口座

1)金融機関   みずほ銀行・上大岡支店・支店番号 364
2)口座番号   (普通)    2917217
3)口座名    隼機関   ハヤブサキカン

B) 郵便局口座

1)口座番号  10940-26934811
2)口座名    隼機関   ハヤブサキカン

*2月28日、MIZ・TA様から、20、000円のご献金を頂きました。馬齢76になる伊勢です。感謝致します。伊勢


2017/05/11 (Thu) 日韓断交、伊勢はアメリカに訴える
nikkan danko march

安倍首相は「韓国は、戦略的利益を共有する、最も重要な隣国であり、北朝鮮問題で連携して対処するとともに、未来志向の日韓関係を発展させていきたいと思います」と述べた。(FNN)

晋三に質問

慰安婦合意には妥協しないとしても、文在寅(ムン・ジェイン)が一方的に対北朝鮮経済援助を開始したらどうするのか?明かな国連決議違反ではないか?文在寅(ムン・ジェイン)は、「竹島は韓国の領土」と宣言する人間なのだ。安倍は大目に見るのか?毎年、韓国海軍は日本が上陸すると仮想して実射訓練を行っているのだ。安倍は黙っているのか?

安倍晋三というか自民党が日韓断交のトゲである。サヨク~うすあまサヨク~親韓議員、、大多数の国民が安倍に任せているからだ。安倍の立場が理解できないわけじゃない。日本の守護国アメリカが日韓断交を許さないからだ。だが、トランプを利用する手がある。トランプは、FBIと摩擦を起こして窮地に追い込まれる。北朝鮮攻撃に出る可能性がある。日本国民はそのとき、日韓断交を要求するべきだ。伊勢


対米広報に、ご寄付を頂きたい


30th aniversary

伊勢は、ブルームバーグにコメントを書いている。昨夜、韓国大統領選の報道を読んで、ブルームバーグ紙に以下のように投稿した。伊勢は日韓国交断絶を望む。さらに、米韓国交断絶も望む。今朝は、そのように書いて投稿した。多くのアメリカの知識人は賛成しており、「米軍も韓国から撤退するべきだ」と書いている。こういう声が大きくなれば日韓断交は可能である。

Moon Jae-in is pro-China, pro-North Korea, anti-USA and anti-Japan. Washington must consider to pull US military out of Korea. US and Japan can defend themselves from North Korea without Korea. We can save a lot of money by doing that.

A) 振込口座

1)金融機関   みずほ銀行・上大岡支店・支店番号 364
2)口座番号   (普通)    2917217
3)口座名    隼機関   ハヤブサキカン

B) 郵便局口座

1)口座番号  10940-26934811
2)口座名    隼機関   ハヤブサキカン

*2月28日、MIZ・TA様から、20、000円のご献金を頂きました。馬齢76になる伊勢です。感謝致します。伊勢


プロフィール

伊勢平次郎

Author:伊勢平次郎
 
伊勢平次郎はペンネーム。アメリカへ単身移住してから50年が経つ。最初の20年間は英語もろくに話せなかった。英語というのは、聴き取りにくく、発音しにくい厄介なものだ。負けん気だけで生きた。味方を作ることが生き残る道だと悟った。そのうち、コロンビア映画、スピールバーグ監督、トヨタ工場、スバル・いすゞ工場の北米進出、日本の新聞社に雇われた。2013・6 冒険小説You Die For Me アブドルの冒険(邦題)をアマゾンから出版した。昨年のクリスマスには、King of Pepper(英語版)胡椒の王様を出版した。日本、英国、デンマーク、ドイツの読者が読んでくれたわ。妻のクリステインと犬2匹で、ルイジアナの湖畔に住む。

写真は、ハヤブサ F. p. japonensis。カタカナで書かれる。瞬間飛翔速度は、時速300キロという猛禽。

最近の記事

最近のコメント

最近のトラックバック

月別アーカイブ

カテゴリー

FC2カウンター

ブロとも申請フォーム

この人とブロともになる

ブログ内検索



RSSフィード



リンク

このブログをリンクに追加する